<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>workblog &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iandunn.name/workblog/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://iandunn.name/workblog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:23:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Good, Bad and Ugly of SEO Methods</title>
		<link>http://iandunn.name/workblog/the-good-bad-and-ugly-of-seo-methods/</link>
		<comments>http://iandunn.name/workblog/the-good-bad-and-ugly-of-seo-methods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iandunn.name/workblog/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with a lot of what Derek Powazek wrote about the SEO industry in Spammers, Evildoers, and Opportunists. His main gist is that the good SEO techniques &#8212; like using tags that match the semantics of the content and setting up 301 redirects when pages move &#8212; should just be considered good development practices, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with a lot of what Derek Powazek wrote about the SEO industry in <a href="http://powazek.com/posts/2090">Spammers, Evildoers, and Opportunists</a>. His main gist is that the good SEO techniques &#8212; like using tags that match the semantics of the content and setting up 301 redirects when pages move &#8212; should just be considered good development practices, and that all the other crap is just polluting the web. If you want to be successful on the web, &#8220;Make something great. Tell people about it. Do it again.&#8221;</p>
<p>But, I do think he takes things a little too far, and makes some generaliztaions, over-simplifications and also some presuppositions about the types of sites he&#8217;s talking about. I think there are some SEO techniques that are ethical and help a site <strong>earn</strong> (not buy) a good ranking without hurting the web. So, I&#8217;ve sorted some of the most common techniques into Good, Bad and Ugly categories to help me when I&#8217;m trying to find a good SEO consultant.</p>
<h3>The Good</h3>
<ul>
<li>Server configuration issues</li>
<li>Organizing and improving content</li>
<li>Unintuitive search engine quarks, like archived content being counted as a duplicate</li>
<li>Pay-Per-Click campaigns and other traditional advertising</li>
<li>Keyword research</li>
<li>Configuring Google&#8217;s Webmaster Tools</li>
<li>Training CMS users on good practices</li>
<li>Setting up 301 redirects</li>
<li>Pretty URLs</li>
<li>Not using images for text, not making the entire site in Flash</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t generate links with JavaScript</li>
<li>Using tags that are appropriate for the content</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Bad</h3>
<ul>
<li>Contrived link building schemes</li>
<li>Creating mini sites that link back to the real site</li>
<li>Paying other sites to publish articles you wrote about yourself</li>
<li>Buried on-site content written specifically for the search engines</li>
</ul>
<h3>The Ugly</h3>
<ul>
<li>Spam blogs</li>
<li>Comment spam</li>
<li>Duplicating content</li>
<li>Domain squatting</li>
<li>Hiding links and keywords</li>
<li>Google bombs</li>
<li>Cloaking content for search engines</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://iandunn.name/workblog/the-good-bad-and-ugly-of-seo-methods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
